International · Treaty verification memo · Firm work product

U.S. income-tax treaty royalty (FDAP) withholding for nonresident NIL athletes

A sourced, dated reconciliation of every treaty rate the SidelineWealth tax engine applies to a nonresident athlete’s U.S.-source name/image/likeness income — for the reviewing tax attorney and CPA to confirm before any withholding or filing.

Verified
2026-08-24
Rate authority
IRS Table 1, Rev. May 2023
In-force authority
IRS A-to-Z (2026-08-24)
Countries
67 partners
Produces the signable copy — source links print as full URLs.

01 — Purpose & scope

What this rate is, and what it is not

When a nonresident athlete earns U.S.-source NIL income, that income is generally FDAP income to the extent it is characterized as a royalty for the use of the athlete’s name, image, and likeness. A treaty may reduce the statutory 30% withholding. The Applied royalty (FDAP) rate below is the treaty royalty rate the engine applies to that income once it is characterized as a royalty — a general royalty rate the income maps into, not a rate defined for NIL.

Three limits the reviewer must weigh

1. The athlete/entertainer article can override this. Personal-service income under Article 16/17 may remain taxable at source regardless of the royalty rate — the royalty vs. personal-service characterization is the threshold question.

2. States generally do not honor the federal treaty. A state may tax the full amount federally exempted.

3. Form W-8BEN (with an ITIN or SSN) is required to claim any treaty rate; without it the payer withholds the full 30%.

02 — Primary sources

Every rate traces to an authoritative source

Rate authorityIRS Table 1 — Tax Rates on Income Other Than Personal Service Income (Rev. May 2023)

irs.gov · tax-treaty-table-1.pdf — royalty columns (income codes 10–12).

In-force authorityIRS — United States income tax treaties A to Z

Retrieved 2026-08-24. irs.gov · treaties A to Z

Narrative authorityIRS Publication 901 — U.S. Tax Treaties

irs.gov · Publication 901 — companion narrative to Table 1; consult the specific treaty article and technical explanation before filing.

03 — Methodology

Choosing one rate from Table 1’s five royalty columns

Table 1 splits royalties into industrial equipment, know-how / other industrial royalties (income code 10), patents, film & TV, and copyrights. NIL is not a patent, film, copyright, or technical know-how; it is a general commercial / publicity-type royalty, whose closest home is the “other industrial royalties” column — the default basis for the applied rate. Two documented exceptions, flagged for counsel:

Canada Counsel

Code-10 column is 0% (the Art. XII(3) technical-know-how exemption); NIL is a general Art. XII(2) royalty at the 10% rate. 10% applied.

Egypt Revised Counsel

The treaty grants no reduction on other/know-how royalties — code 10 is 30% (Art. 13(1)); only patents and copyright drop to 15%. Read as a general royalty, NIL takes the unreduced 30%. Confirm the characterization.

04 — This verification

Six rates changed on 2026-08-24

The in-force list itself was unchanged — no new ratifications, terminations, or suspensions. One rate was stale; four had used a lower copyright/film sub-rate instead of the general “other” rate; one is a conservative characterization call.

Spain
5%0%
Stale — the 2019 protocol (in force Nov 2019) zeroed all Spanish royalty columns (Art. 12). No column supported 5%; this was over-withholding.
Israel
10%15%
10% was the copyright/film sub-rate; the general “other” royalty (code 10, Art. 14) is 15%.
South Korea
10%15%
10% was the film/copyright sub-rate; general “other” (code 10, Art. 14) is 15%.
Romania
10%15%
10% was the film/copyright sub-rate; general “other” (code 10, Art. 12) is 15%.
Italy
5%8%
5% was the industrial-equipment rate; general “other” (code 10, Art. 12) is 8%.
Egypt
15%30%
The treaty gives no reduction on other/know-how royalties (code 10 = 30%, Art. 13(1)); 15% is only the patent/copyright rate. Flagged for counsel.
Canada
10% · held
Reviewed, unchanged. Code-10 shows 0% (a technical-know-how exemption), but NIL rides the general Art. XII(2) 10% rate. Documented, not drift.

05 — Surveillance

How often this is re-checked

A dated reconciliation is worth what its maintenance is worth. Treaty positions move in two independent ways — a treaty’s status changes (ratified, terminated, suspended), or the rate document itself is reissued — so each is watched separately, on its own cadence.

Treaty actions, as published
Twice daily
An automated agent reads the U.S. Federal Register for treaty actions and files anything relevant for human review, so a published change surfaces the same day.
Applied table vs. the IRS in-force list
Twice daily
Every run re-diffs the whole table against the authoritative in-force list. Any divergence — a rate claimed for a treaty not in force, or a partner modeled as having none — is filed as critical. This is the check that caught Croatia.
The in-force list itself, for edits
Twice daily · re-verify at 60 days
The IRS treaties A-to-Z page is fetched and compared against the exact version this table was built from, so a re-verification is raised when the source actually changes rather than on a calendar. The 60-day clock remains as a backstop, and re-raises monthly until cleared, so freshness cannot decay quietly even if a fetch fails.
The rate document itself (Table 1)
Twice daily · re-verify at 180 days
The published Table 1 is fetched and its revision compared to the May 2023 edition every rate here was read from. A reissue is filed as critical, because it means each rate must be re-read against the new document. Table 1 is revised every few years rather than continuously, so it carries a longer re-verification clock than treaty status.

Detection is automated; every change is applied by a human. Nothing here is auto-published — a flagged change becomes a review task, and these rates move only once someone has re-read the source and re-run the reconciliation. Confirmed public changes post to Law Watch.

06 — Master reference

Every covered country, with its Table 1 provenance

The Applied royalty (FDAP) rate is what the engine uses. The shaded Know-how / Other (10) column is its basis; the remaining columns let the characterization be checked against the treaty article. = no discrete Table 1 row (successor treaties).

CountryStatusApplied
royalty (FDAP)
Ind.
equip.
Know-how /
Other (10)
PatentsFilm/TV
(11)
Copyright
(12)
Art.
ArmeniaAMCIS treaty0%00000III(1)(a)
AustraliaAUIn force5%n/a555512(2)
AustriaATIn force0%n/a0010012(1)
AzerbaijanAZCIS treaty0%00000III(1)(a)
BangladeshBDIn force10%n/a1010101012(2)
BarbadosBBIn force5%n/a555512(2)
BelgiumBEIn force0%n/a000012(1)
Bosnia & HerzegovinaBASuccessor10%1970 Yugo.
BulgariaBGIn force5%n/a555512(2)
CanadaCACounselIn force10%1000100XII(2),(3)
ChileCLIn force10%21010101012(1)-(6)
China (PRC)CNIn force10%710101010Art. 10
CyprusCYIn force0%n/a000014(1)
CzechiaCZIn force10%1010100012(2)
DenmarkDKIn force0%n/a000012(1)
EgyptEGRevisedCounselIn force30%n/a3015n/a1513(1)
EstoniaEEIn force10%51010101012(2)
FinlandFIIn force0%n/a000012(1)
FranceFRIn force0%n/a000012(1)
GeorgiaGECIS treaty0%00000III(1)(a)
GermanyDEIn force0%n/a000012(1)
GreeceGRIn force0%000300VII
IcelandISIn force5%n/a505012(1)
IndiaINIn force15%101515151512(2)
IndonesiaIDIn force10%101010101013(2)
IrelandIEIn force0%n/a000012(1)
IsraelILRevisedIn force15%n/a1515101014(1)
ItalyITRevisedIn force8%5888012(2)
JamaicaJMIn force10%n/a1010101012(2)
JapanJPIn force0%n/a000012(1)
KazakhstanKZIn force10%101010101012(2)
KyrgyzstanKGCIS treaty0%00000III(1)(a)
LatviaLVIn force10%51010101012(2)
LithuaniaLTIn force10%51010101012(2)
LuxembourgLUIn force0%n/a000013(1)
MaltaMTIn force10%n/a1010101012(2)
MexicoMXIn force10%101010101012(2)
MoldovaMDCIS treaty0%00000III(1)(a)
MontenegroMESuccessor10%1970 Yugo.
MoroccoMAIn force10%n/a1010101012(2)
NetherlandsNLIn force0%n/a000013(1)
New ZealandNZIn force5%n/a555512(2)
NorwayNOIn force0%n/a00n/a010(1)
PakistanPKIn force0%n/a00n/a0VIII(1)
PhilippinesPHIn force15%n/a1515151513(2)
PolandPLIn force10%n/a1010101013(2)
PortugalPTIn force10%101010101013(2)
RomaniaRORevisedIn force15%n/a1515101012(2)
SerbiaRSSuccessor10%1970 Yugo.
SlovakiaSKIn force10%1010100012(2)
SloveniaSIIn force5%n/a555512(1)
South AfricaZAIn force0%n/a000012(1)
South KoreaKRRevisedIn force15%n/a1515101014(1)
SpainESRevisedIn force0%n/a000012(1)
Sri LankaLKIn force10%51010101012(2)
SwedenSEIn force0%n/a000012(1)
SwitzerlandCHIn force0%n/a00n/a012(1)
TajikistanTJCIS treaty0%00000III(1)(a)
ThailandTHIn force15%815155512(2)
Trinidad & TobagoTTIn force15%n/a1515n/a014(1)
TunisiaTNIn force15%101515151512(2)-(3)
TürkiyeTRIn force10%51010101012(2)
TurkmenistanTMCIS treaty0%00000III(1)(a)
UkraineUAIn force10%n/a1010101012(2)
United KingdomGBIn force0%n/a000012(1)
UzbekistanUZCIS treaty0%00000III(1)(a)
VenezuelaVEIn force10%51010101012(2)

Terminated, suspended, pending & no-treaty

Hungary — terminated (1 Jan 2024): no benefits; 30% default applies. Russia & Belarus — partially suspended: not treated as reduced-rate partners here. Croatia — signed, not yet in force: 30% until U.S. Senate ratification. All other countries have no U.S. income-tax treaty — the full statutory 30% FDAP rate applies.

07 — Reviewer sign-off

Confirmation before reliance

These rates are illustrative and require professional confirmation for the specific athlete, the characterization of each payment, and the governing treaty article before any withholding or filing. The reviewers below attest they have verified the applicable rate(s) against the primary sources for the matter at hand. To execute: print or save this page as a PDF, then sSign the block below and retain the signed copy in the engagement workpapers. The signed attestation is not submitted to or stored by SidelineWealth; it stays in the reviewing firm’s records.

Reviewing tax attorney
Name & signature
Firm / bar no.
Date
Reviewing CPA
Name & signature
Firm / license no.
Date

Disclaimer

This memo and all rates in it are for general informational and financial-planning-illustration purposes only and do not constitute legal, tax, accounting, or immigration advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed. Treaty data is sourced from public IRS materials that may be outdated or incomplete; accuracy and timeliness are not warranted, and rules may change, including retroactively. The tax classification of NIL income (royalty vs. personal-service characterization) is unsettled.

Per the SidelineWealth™ Disclaimer §8.1: you are solely responsible for your own tax, filing, and compliance decisions, and you should consult a qualified, licensed CPA, tax attorney, or financial advisor before acting on any Output. International and visa-holding athletes must also consult qualified immigration counsel. The full disclaimer governs and is available at /legal/disclaimer.

Operated by CLV Media, LLC · legal@sidelinewealth.com

Generated from lib/rules/treaties.mjs · reconciled against IRS Table 1 — Tax Rates on Income Other Than Personal Service Income (Rev. May 2023) · verified 2026-08-24 · public rate reference · treaty changes we track